GPI: THE ADDITION OF A COST ANALYSIS CHANGES THE OUTCOME OF A TENDER

European Statement: 

  • Introductory Statements and Governance 

Author(s): 

Camilla Munk Mikkelsen

What was done?: 

Tenders are made on ATC-level 5, but clinically equivalent therapeutic areas are evaluated on ATC-level 4. The analogue competition is an important strategic tool when conducting tenders and elaborating national recommendations on therapeutic areas (TA). Since 2017 the evaluation of TA has been based on a clinical evaluation, an economic evaluation and a tender. Previously the call for tenders was based on clinical evidence only. To evaluate whether the addition of a cost analysis (CA) to a tender evaluation would alter the drug recommendation of TA, a re-evaluation of the processed TA, evaluated from October 2018 until October 2019, was made on multiple sclerosis, rheumatoid arthritis and severe asthma.

Why was it done?: 

Including a CA in the evaluation is time-consuming and I wanted to evaluate whether the obtained drug recommendation was different from the result we could have achieved without the inclusion of a CA. The CA process includes data collection from clinicians within resource consumption per drug, including the costs of time usage of physician, nurse and patient, transportation expenses, monitoring costs, blood tests, co-medicine, utensils, shipping and hospital facilities. When a CA is included it is possible to take the derived costs associated with treatment of different drug dispensing forms and specific costs of treatment with various analogue drugs into account to achieve a recommendation upon the lowest total price including the tender price and the derived costs associated with the treatment.

How was it done?: 

The drug recommendations on TA made in the period was re-evaluated. Results from the cases with multiple sclerosis, rheumatoid arthritis and severe asthma were evaluated on clinical evaluation, tender price and finally with or without the CA.

What has been achieved?: 

From October 2018 to October 2019 three TA have ended the evaluation process. The recommendation of severe asthma had a similar outcome regardless of the process used. For multiple sclerosis and rheumatoid arthritis, the CA altered the drug recommendations.

What next?: 

In order to balance resource consumption on performing CA and the economic impact on the outcome, the plan is to identify TA where it isn’t meaningful to conduct a cost analysis. In all other areas a CA will be included in the standard procedures.

Keywords: 

  • Drug use evaluation›Cost analysis
  • Drug use evaluation›Drug therapy outcomes
  • Management›Health economics
Conflict of interest: 

Type: 

GPI

Stakeholder: 

Hospital Pharmacy profession

Document: 

Statement: 

Statement 1.1
Statement 1.2
Statement 1.3
Statement 1.4
Statement 1.5
Statement 1.6
Statement 1.7

Evidence status: 

THE ADDITION OF A COST ANALYSIS CHANGES THE OUTCOME OF A TENDER